Why does a nuclear power plant have to refuel?
If nuclear waste is still radioactive, why does a nuclear power plant have to refuel?
Tags: Nuclear, nuclear power plant, nuclear waste, plant, power, refuel, waste
Related Items
- What happens when a Nuclear Power Plant fails?
This morning in my town of San Clemente the air raid sirens went off unexpectingly due to a mechanicle error in the siren. There was no real danger bu... - What would happen if a nuclear power plant in the UK exploded?
I live in Kent and the nearest nuclear power plant is at Dungeness. what would happen if the was to explode? ... - What would you prefer to see on the landscape? A wind farm or a nuclear power plant?
It is less dangerous to have a wind farm than a nuclear power plant. It also costs less to build a wind farm than it does to build or dismantle a nucl... - Can nuclear power plants create black holes?
I'm doing a project in science and need to know: If someone were to create a nuclear power plant in central california, could it create a black hole? ... - How different is the process to make nuclear fuel for power plants vs. weapons grade nuclear material?
Does having a nuclear power plant automatically mean you have a nuclear weapon capability? If not why, and what must happen before said material becom... - What is nuclear waste, and what do they do to dispose it?
I have this assignment at school and i have to talk about nuclear power and nuclear waste and make an opinion on whether it's worth it. Just wondering... - Is it possible for a nuclear power plant to experience a nuclear explosion?
Please answer the question, then tell me why or why not? ... - what does it mean when the red light keeps flashing in a nuclear power plant?
im just here on work experience and everyone's left me on my own. i dont know what to do. ... - What would happen to a drum of nuclear waste?
if it was put into a bubbling volcano? Would the waste change into something else and become inactive? In the event of an eruption would the nuclear w... - What is the safest way to store the waste radioactive from a nuclear power stations?
I NEED HELP!! PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!! ... - Can you think of anything to do with nuclear power?
I need to think of more questions i might be asked about a pre-release paper for physics on nuclear power. So far i have: Gov't initiatives Accident... - What is the difference between a nuclear reactor and power plant?
I was assigned a project on Nuclear Reactors and am wondering if there is a difference between the two? There is deffiantly more info on power plants ... - What would happen if we put nuclear waste into a volcano?
Is nuclear waste reactive in any way? Would the extreme heat of a volcano make any reaction? What would be a problem with storing the waste in a(n act... - What determines the life of nuclear power plants?
I researched that on average, nuclear power plants are designed to last 30-40 years, and in some cases 60 years. What determines the life of the plant... - How do you make a home nuclear generator to power electricity?
Hey. I am tired of paying the electricity bill and got fined for taking my neighbours from his pond. Turned out he never watched tv or had a computer....
September 5th, 2010 at 11:46 am
Because the fuel becomes spent and is no longer radioactive enough. Reprocessing involves extracting the radioactive material from the spent fuel and making it into new fuel rods. (And chucking some in the sea)
September 5th, 2010 at 12:46 pm
The answer above was partially right. It isn’t radio active enough. The US does not reprocess its spent fuel rods. France does. It’s expensive, but they get 94% of the original fuel rods back in the power plants. They do not dump anything into the ocean. France buries the 6% waste, which is low grade radio activity, on the site of the power plant. You can look it up.
September 5th, 2010 at 12:53 pm
the rods get contaminated with products that absorb neutrons which spoils the chain reaction. there are a number of ways to reclaim and reuse the rods, but recycle is just not the american way.
September 5th, 2010 at 1:51 pm
Lare has provided the underlying answer. Uranium is a fuel and just like other fuels it needs to be replaced. The fact that it is mildly radioactive, and the combustion products rather more radioactive is an unrelated issue.
To me it makes a great deal of sense to reprocess – uranium is, after all, a limited resource.